In tracing the changing face of the Irish landscape, scholars have traditionally relied primarily on evidence from historical documents. However, such documentary sources provide a fragmentary record at best. Reliable accounts are very scarce for many parts of Ireland prior to the seventeenth century, and many of the relevant documents from the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries focus selectively on matters relating to military or commercial interests.
Studies of fossilized pollen grains preserved in peats and lake muds provide an additional means of investigating vegetative landscape change. Details of changes in vegetation resulting from both human activities and natural events are reflected in the kinds and quantities of minute pollen grains that become trapped in sediments. Analysis of samples can identify which kinds of plants produced the preserved pollen grains and when they were deposited, and in many cases the findings can serve to supplement or correct the documentary record.
For example, analyses of samples from Long Lough in County Down have revealed significant patterns of cereal-grain pollen beginning by about 400 A.D. The substantial clay content of the soil in this part of Down makes cultivation by primitive tools difficult. Historians thought that such soils were not tilled to any significant extent until the introduction of the moldboard plough to Ireland in the seventh century A.D. Because cereal cultivation would have required tilling of the soil, the pollen evidence indicates that these soils must indeed have been successfully tilled before the introduction of the new plough.
Another example concerns flax cultivation in County Down, one of the great linen-producing areas of Ireland during the eighteenth century. Some aspects of linen production in Down are well documented, but the documentary record tells little about the cultivation of flax, the plant from which linen is made, in that area. The record of eighteenth-century linen production in Down, together with the knowledge that flax cultivation had been established in Ireland centuries before that time, led some historians to surmise that this plant was being cultivated in Down before the eighteenth century. But pollen analyses indicate that this is not the case; flax pollen was found only in deposits laid down since the eighteenth century.
It must be stressed, though, that there are limits to the ability of the pollen record to reflect the vegetative history of the landscape. For example, pollen analyses cannot identify the species, but only the genus or family, of some plants. Among these is madder, a cultivated dye plant of historical importance in Ireland. Madder belongs to a plant family that also comprises various native weeds, including goosegrass. If madder pollen were present in a deposit it would be indistinguishable from that of uncultivated native species.
The passage indicates that prior to the use of pollen analysis in the study of the history of the Irish landscape, at least some historians believed which one of the following?
Correct
Incorrect
The correct answer is (E).
Pollen Analysis and the Irish Landscape
Step 1: Read the Passage Strategically
Sample Highlighting
In tracing the changing face of the Irish landscape, scholars have traditionally relied primarily on evidence from historical documents. However, such documentary sources provide a fragmentary record at best. Reliable accounts are very scarce for many parts of Ireland prior to the seventeenth century, and many of the relevant documents from the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries focus selectively on matters relating to military or commercial interests.
Studies of fossilized pollen grains preserved in peats and lake muds provide an additional means of investigating vegetative landscape change. Details of changes in vegetation resulting from both human activities and natural events are reflected in the kinds and quantities of minute pollen grains that become trapped in sediments. Analysis of samples can identify which kinds of plants produced the preserved pollen grains and when they were deposited, and in many cases the findings can serve to supplement or correct the documentary record.
For example, analyses of samples from Long Lough in County Down have revealed significant patterns of cereal-grain pollen beginning by about 400 A.D. The substantial clay content of the soil in this part of Down makes cultivation by primitive tools difficult. Historians thought that such soils were not tilled to any significant extent until the introduction of the moldboard plough to Ireland in the seventh century A.D. Because cereal cultivation would have required tilling of the soil, the pollen evidence indicates that these soils must indeed have been successfully tilled before the introduction of the new plough.
Another example concerns flax cultivation in County Down, one of the great linen-producing areas of Ireland during the eighteenth century. Some aspects of linen production in Down are well documented, but the documentary record tells little about the cultivation of flax, the plant from which linen is made, in that area. The record of eighteenth-century linen production in Down, together with the knowledge that flax cultivation had been established in Ireland centuries before that time, led some historians to surmise that this plant was being cultivated in Down before the eighteenth century. But pollen analyses indicate that this is not the case; flax pollen was found only in deposits laid down since the eighteenth century.
It must be stressed, though, that there are limits to the ability of the pollen record to reflect the vegetative history of the landscape. For example, pollen analyses cannot identify the species, but only the genus or family, of some plants. Among these is madder, a cultivated dye plant of historical importance in Ireland. Madder belongs to a plant family that also comprises various native weeds, including goosegrass. If madder pollen were present in a deposit it would be indistinguishable from that of uncultivated native species.
Passage Notes
Paragraph 1
Scholars rely on hist. docs to trace hist. of land
Hist. docs not so reliable
Paragraph 2
Pollen fossils an add'l way to track changes
What pollen grains can show
Paragraph 3
Ex: cereal pollen in Co. Down
Historians: soils not tilled before 7th C.
Cereal pollen = soil was tilled before 7th C.
Paragraph 4
Ex: flax pollen in Co. Down
Doc. record scarce on flax
Historians: flax grown pre-18th C.
Pollen: flax grown only since 18th C.
Paragraph 5
Limits on pollen's ability to show hist.
Ex: madder
Pollen can't disting. madder from other species
Discussion
Paragraph 1 of this Natural Science passage introduces limitations on the traditional study of Ireland's landscape: accounts of the landscape are scarce, and where they do exist, they are incomplete. That provides our Topic (the historical Irish landscape), but Scope and Purpose are still wide open.
Paragraph 2 introduces a supplemental source of information that will eventually become the Scope of the passage: studies of fossilized pollen grains, and what they can tell us about changes in the landscape. The paragraph outlines the information pollen grains can provide about the vegetative history of a region, and then relates that information to the historical record. The author seems to value the pollen evidence for its ability to "supplement or correct" the historical record.
Paragraphs 3 and 4 provide examples of how pollen grain information has changed beliefs about some aspects of historical land development. Don't worry too much about the details of these paragraphs—you can come back to them if a question asks you to.
Finally, paragraph 5 notes that pollen analysis isn't without its own limitations and gives an example. It's not until the end that we can be sure of the author's Purpose, which is largely informative: to explain the impact of a new information source on our understanding of the evolution of the Irish landscape. The Main Idea reflects this: The author believes that studies of fossilized pollen can be useful for supplementing or correcting the historical record when studying changes in Ireland's landscape.
(E) Detail
Step 2: Identify the Question Type
The question stem begins with the phrase "the passage indicates"; this categorical wording indicates a Detail question.
Step 3: Research the Relevant Text
This question focuses on the beliefs of some historians. Look for where you identified these historians' views in your Roadmap. The third sentence of paragraph 3 and the third sentence of paragraph 4 will provide the basis for your prediction.
Step 4: Make a Prediction
The third sentence of paragraph 3 says that historians believed that soils in County Down weren't tilled until the seventh century A.D., when the moldboard plough was introduced to Ireland. The third sentence of paragraph 4 says that historians believed that flax was being cultivated in County Down before the eighteenth century.
Step 5: Evaluate the Answer Choices
(E) perfectly paraphrases the historians' belief about flax cultivation.
(A) is Outside the Scope. Flooding isn't mentioned anywhere in the passage. Also, the seventeenth century is mentioned only in connection with recordkeeping, in the first paragraph.
(B) is too broad. The historians believed cereal wasn't cultivated in this particular part of Ireland before the seventh century because the soil in this location was hard to till.
(C) is directly contradicted by the third sentence of the first paragraph, which say that sixteenth- and seventeenth-century records of the Irish landscape focus "selectively on matters relating to military or commercial interests."
(D) misuses the details concerning madder. Madder is mentioned, but in the context of the limitations of the pollen evidence; there's nothing in the passage concerning views about when it was first used as a dye plant.
